LITIGASI SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH: STRATEGI DAN PRAKTIK ADVOKAT FIRMA HUKUM KARIMATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58293/esa.v8i1.186Keywords:
Litigation, Sharia Economic Disputes, Advocate StrategyAbstract
The development of the Sharia-based financial and business industry in Indonesia has driven an increase in economic transactions using Sharia contracts. On the other hand, this dynamic has also given rise to various disputes related to breach of contract, contract enforcement, and differences in interpretation of Sharia contracts. In certain circumstances, these disputes cannot be resolved through non-litigation channels and must be pursued through litigation in the courts. Therefore, the role of advocates is crucial in formulating litigation strategies that are not only based on positive law but also consider the principles of Sharia economics. This study aims to analyze the strategies and practices of advocates in handling Sharia economic dispute litigation, specifically the advocacy practices carried out by advocates at the Karimata Law Firm.
This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews with advocates experienced in handling Sharia economic cases, observations of advocates' work processes in handling cases, and documentation and literature review related to Sharia economic law and litigation practices. The collected data was then analyzed qualitatively through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing to gain a comprehensive understanding of advocacy strategies for resolving Sharia economic disputes through litigation.
The research findings indicate that the practice of Sharia economic dispute litigation has unique characteristics that require advocates to integrate an understanding of positive law with Sharia economic principles. An effective litigation strategy begins with an in-depth case analysis, including examining contract documents, identifying potential breaches of contract, and mapping the parties' legal positions. Furthermore, the success of a case is greatly influenced by the advocate's ability to develop systematic and evidence-based legal arguments. The research findings also indicate that an advocate's practical experience plays a crucial role in understanding trial dynamics and formulating appropriate strategies during the litigation process. Furthermore, good communication between the advocate and the client is a supporting factor in maintaining information consistency and strengthening the legal position in court. Therefore, the success of Sharia economic dispute litigation is determined not only by the normative aspects of the law but also by the advocate's professional competence in managing a structured advocacy strategy aligned with the values of justice in Sharia principles.
References
Alqorni, Alfarizkie, Fakhry Wahyuda Siregar, Prasetyo Seto Putro, Surya Rahman, and Muhammad Rafly. “PENYELESAIAN PERKARA” 3, no. 1 (2025).
Azmi, Muhammad, Robbani Jakfar, Lucky Dafira Nugroho, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, and Perumahan Telang Inda. “Strategi Perancangan Kontrak Yang Baik Sebagai Instrumen Pencegahan Sengketa” 3, no. 6 (2025).
Eryasafli, Rafael Ahmad, Siti Maharani, and Muhammad Faiz Zakwan. “Custodia : Journal of Legal , Political , and Humanistic Inquiry Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Di Indonesia : Analisis Mekanisme Pengaduan Internal , Mediasi LAPSPI , Dan Litigasi Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen” 1, no. 2 (2025).
Hafizah, Nasywa, Tiara Cantika Pebytabella P, and Mutiya Sari. “Identifikasi Variabel Penelitian , Jenis Sumber Data Dalam Penelitian Pendidikan,” 2025, 586—96.
Islam, Hukum. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Asuransi Menurut Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Islam” 1 (2025): 1—17.
Jasmin, Muhammad Hagi, and Jasman Nazar. “Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Lisan Akibat Giro Kosong Dan Upaya Penyelesaiannya ( Studi Pada CV . Multirejeki Selaras )” 5, no. 1 (2026): 5166—73.
Lubis, Fauziah, Nurul Ichsani Harahap, Dea Livia, Tiara Hingga Sembiring, M Aldauri Lubis, and Aulia Rahman Sitepu. “Peran Advokat Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan” 6, no. 1 (2025): 104—13.
Mikraj, A L, Fauziah Lubis, Era Majida Daulay, Aldi Saputra Siregar, and Muhammad Riski Harahap. “Peran Advokat Memberikan Hak-Hak Terhadap Klien” 5, no. 2 (2025): 1269—82. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v5i2.6799.
Nurfaradisa, Sasmita, Annisa Putri Anugrah, Sumirahayu Sulaiman, and Atin Meriati Isnaini. “Pembiayaan Bermasalah ( Non Performing Financing ) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Non-Performing Financing from the Perspective of Islamic Economic Law” 9, no. 2 (2026): 2285—92. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v9i2.7374.
Pendidikan, Evaluasi, and Seni Tari. “3 1,2,3” 11 (2026).
Poltak, Hendrik, and Robert Rianto Widjaja. “Pendekatan Metode Studi Kasus Dalam Riset Kualitatif,” 2024, 1—4. https://doi.org/10.59810/localengineering.
Ramadhana, Yulia, Riska Yunita Putri, and Ahmadi Hasan. “Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Litigasi,” 2026, 310—17.
Sasra, Adelia Dara, Alfaning Martina Kharismawati, Muhammad Alldo Hibahtillah, Joytry Ritiau, Benny Sumardiana, and Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah. “Peranan Advokat Sebagai Pemberi Bantuan Hukum Dalam Menentukan Strategi Penyelesaian Perkara” 2, no. 5 (2025): 345—51.
Sibaliparriq, Jurnal. “Strategi Optimalisasi Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Keluarga Islam Di Pengadilan Agama” 1, no. 2 (2024).
Sinergi Pemerintah Dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah Dalam Peningkatan Literasi Ekonomi Islam, 2025.
Studi, Program, Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Esa Unggul, Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna, Program Studi, Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Esa Unggul. “Telaah Kritis Atas Kedudukan Hukum Penasehat Hukum Dalam Pembuktian Pada Perkara Perdata” 3, no. 1 (2026).
Sudarmika, I Nyoman, I Made Saryana, Ida Bagus, and Candra Yana. “Penggunaan Teknik Strobo Dalam Pemotretan Gerakan Tari Hanoman” 6 (n.d.): 17—28.
Syariah, Ekonomi. “Implementasi Prinsip Sederhana Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa” 2, no. 1 (2025): 28—37.
Tamba, Tumanda. “Efektivitas Peran Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Bidang Bisnis Maupun Hukum,” n.d., 445—60.
Ulul, Muhamad, and Albab Musaffa. “Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Sistem Hukum Indonesia : Studi Komparatif Antara Litigasi Dan Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ),” n.d.
Zuhri, Muhammad Fadil, Wahyuni Pohan, Muhammad Rizki Firmansyah, Ayu Hijrani Salamah, Aditya Dwipa Alkanzu, Universitas Islam, and Negeri Sumatera. “PERAN ADVOKAT DALAM MENEGAKKAN KEADILAN BERDASARKAN PRINSIP-” 2, no. 6 (2025): 503—11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dela Puspita Sari, Sofiatus Sobriyah, Siti Rohmah, Siti Aisyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
